| Popular Products & Programs |
|
|
Juvederm™ |
 |
Introduction & Overview |
Juvederm™ is a pharmaceutical drug created by the same company that developed BOTOX® Cosmetic injections, both of which are advertised as capable of reducing the appearance of wrinkles, fine lines and other signs of aging on the skin. This product is marketed as an injection (to be administered by a qualified physician) directly into the facial skin.
There may be both pros and cons to using a prescription drug to meet our healthcare and nutritional needs. Physicians may prescribe a drug when they determine that a consumer product may not be effective; prescription drugs, however, may induce side effects for some. We will get a closer look at this product to see if it may be worth considering for long-term use.
|
| Ingredients at a Glance |
According to the product’s official website, the drug has been formulated with Hyaluronic Acid, which is cited as one of the key ingredients. We are glad to see Hyaluronic Acid mentioned in the formulation, but this leaves us wondering why the drug is prescription-based only, considering many other products on the market may also contain this substance.
Hyaluronic Acid is believed to be one of the finest available substances for promoting water and moisture retention, which may be especially important for women suffering from dry or sensitive skin, in addition to wrinkles and fine lines. Hyaluronic Acid-based formulas are believed to have properties that may lead to softer, smoother and healthier overall skin.
|
| Ingredients in Focus |
The company may claim that injections are the way to go for improving the appearance of facial skin, but savvier women may wish to find out if there is any concrete evidence supporting such assertions. We question whether it is worth the pain and costs of pursuing a prescription-based injection, when topical creams containing Hyaluronic Acid are available.
Unfortunately, the company does not appear to disclose a full list of ingredients on the official website at time of review. This may pose a problem for many reasons, including the difficulty that may be encountered by women seeking this information online or through other public sources. Of course, we are also concerned about the presence of any potentially harmful ingredients.
|
| Lifestyle |
As with any prescription drugs, the company warns prospective users of some of the potential side effects that may occur from exposure to this product. Women with a history of allergies to “gram-positive bacterial proteins” – or those with a history of severe allergies in general – may not be suitable candidates for experimenting with this prescription drug.
According to the company, some of the side effects that may occur when using this drug may include redness, pain and tenderness, firmness, swelling, lumps and bumps, bruising, itching and discoloration. Individuals may also prefer to avoid strenuous exercise, alcohol consumption and prolonged exposure to heat in the days following the injections in question.
|
| Positives |
• May contain a form of Hyaluronic Acid
• Advertised as based on a pharmaceutical-grade formula
|
| Negatives |
• A prescription is required to use this drug
• There may be a number of adverse side effects for some people
• A money-back guarantee may not be available
• Consumer testimonials may be hard to come by
|
| Final Thoughts |
Juvederm™ may appeal to some women due to its association with BOTOX®, which has become popular in many circles, thanks to its proliferation among celebrities and others leading the rich, famous and glamorous lifestyle. However, in reality, we believe it may be inconvenient in more ways than one to be subjected repeatedly to costly and potentially painful injections on the face.
Alternatively, women who demand the best in anti-aging care may prefer to consider some of the anti-wrinkle creams marketed by some of the more reputable companies. Some contain Hyaluronic Acid, in addition to other premium substances, and may be both effective and safe. Money-back guarantees may be available to appease the skeptics.
|
|
|
|
